Search Results for "going behind decree"

329 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 329 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit — Arbitration Award Not Binding on Third Party Purchaser. The Court held that an arbitration award does not operate as res judicata against a party who was not a party to the arbitration and who purchased the property in a court auction.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for possession and mesne profits in respect of a three-storey commercial-cum-residential building situated at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Ownership Dispute, Quashing Bombay High Court PIL Judgment. Revenue Minister's Recall of Ex Parte Order Upheld as Violative of Natural Justice Under Section 258 Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and Appellants' Title Established Based on 1894 Deed.

The appeals arose from a Bombay High Court judgment in a Public Interest Litigation concerning ownership of land admeasuring 5 acres and 20 gunthas in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeals Against Restitution of Conjugal Rights Decree and Dismissal of Divorce Petition. Husband Failed to Prove Cruelty or Desertion; Wife's Refusal to Stay with In-Laws Not Unreasonable.

The case involves two appeals filed by the husband, Rakesh Jaiswal, against the judgments of the Family Court, Aurangabad. The first appeal (FCA No. 8...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Arbitration Suit for Non-Compliance of Court Order. Petitioner Failed to Pay Costs as Directed, Leading to Dismissal Under Order IX Rule 8 CPC.

The petitioner, M/s Crompton Greaves Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Mandatory Injunction. Court holds that the First Appellate Court's finding on possession was perverse and that the suit for mandatory injunction was not barred by laches.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the original plaintiff, Shri Gurudas Yeshwant Pednekar, against the judgment of the Firs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Easement Case — Right of Way Established by Prescription. Plaintiffs' claim for easement of necessity fails due to alternative access, but right of way by prescription under Section 15 of Easements Act, 1882 is upheld based on 20 years of uninterrupted user.

The case involves a dispute over a right of way between two branches of the same family. The plaintiffs, Laxman Sagun Vaigankar and Sitabai Sitaram Va...