Search Results for "eyewitness"

966 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 966 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anjalappa and Ashok, were convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in S.C. No.322/2012 for the murder of a person unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitnesses were interested and their evidence was inconsistent with medical and other evidence.

The case pertains to the murder of Dnyandeo Thakare, who was allegedly assaulted by two accused, Laxman Bhatkar and Devidas Wankhede, on 6th April 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's account was inconsistent and lacked corroboration, leading to benefit of doubt.

The appellant, Deepak Pralhad Shejwal, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Sham Gade and sentenced to life impr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Dacoity Based on Injured Eyewitness Testimony. Testimony of Injured Witness Held Sufficient for Conviction Under Sections 395, 396, 302, 397 IPC.

The appellant, Ajaykumar Sunilkumar Sharma, was convicted by the 11th Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Dewree, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No.690 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Six Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 341, 506, 148 read with 149 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 302, 341, 506, 148 read with 149 IPC. The appellants were convicted by the Additional...