Search Results for "exorbitant demand"

145 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Penalty on Company Officials Under CGST Act Due to Lack of Personal Liability Evidence and Procedural Flaws. Petitioners Challenge Penalty Order for Fake Input Tax Credit Allegations

The petitioners, employees of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order-in-original dated 1 February 2025 that i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Inclusion of Compensatory Allowances in Overtime Calculations Under Factories Act, 1948 - Appellants Appeal Dismissed Against Respondents

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by Union of India challenging High Court judgment which held compensatory allowances must be included in 'or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Carriage of Goods by Sea Case — Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Due to Non-Service of Summons. Service of summons on agent of foreign principal held insufficient to bind the principal under Order 5 Rule 12 of CPC, 1908.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 18 October 2014 passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay in SC Suit No.7175 of 1997. The plaintiff, D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cruelty by Husband Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegations of Dowry Demand and Harassment Under Section 498A IPC Fail as Prosecution Witnesses Turn Hostile and Material Contradictions Remain Unexplained.

The petitioner, Sadananda Naik, was convicted by the JMFC (III Court), Mangalore, in C.C. No. 5099/2007 for the offence punishable under Section 498A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Debt or Liability. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails as complainant failed to prove legally enforceable debt.

The applicants, Ravindra s/o Bhimrao Khillare, Seema w/o Ravindra Khillare, Deepak s/o Bhimrao Khillare, and Kalpana w/o Deepak Khillare, filed a crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant's Appeal Dismissed as Loan Not Established as Legally Recoverable Debt Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Girdhari Parmanand Motiani, filed two criminal appeals against the acquittal of the respondents, Vinayak Bhagwan Khavnekar and another,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Gorakh Pandurang Jedhe, a clerk in the Irrigation Department, who was charged under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SICOM's Petition Against Guarantors Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act — Guarantors' Liability Is Co-extensive with Principal Debtor, No Need to Exhaust Remedies Against Principal Debtor First

The petitioner, M/s. SICOM Limited, a State Financial Corporation, filed two petitions under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporation Act,...