Search Results for "excess profits tax"

160 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Payment of Occupational Charges in Landlord-Tenant Dispute Pending Determination of Applicable Tenancy Law. The Court held that a tenant continuing in possession after forfeiture of lease is liable to pay mesne profits at market rate, not contractual rent, under Section 2(12) CPC.

The Supreme Court was hearing special leave petitions filed by a landlord challenging a judgment of the Calcutta High Court which held that the landlo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Notice Issued Beyond Four Years Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Already Scrutinized Transactions is Invalid.

The petitioner, Sterlite Technologies Limited, challenged a notice dated 27 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reasse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasonable Belief and Change of Opinion. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Proof of Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Vedanta Limited (formerly Sterlite Opportunities and Ventures Limited), challenged a notice dated 28 March 2008 issued under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Deemed Dividend Case Under Section 2(22)(e) of Income Tax Act. ITAT Correctly Held That Loans to Assessee Were Not Covered as Deemed Dividend Since Lender Companies Had No Accumulated Profits.

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 20th Fe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Orders in KVAT Act Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Penalty under Section 53(8) of KVAT Act cannot be imposed without assessment and opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, M/s B.L. Kashyap & Sons Ltd., a company engaged in civil works contracts, challenged orders dated 8.9.2017 passed by the Joint Commiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules Share Issue Expenses to Dilute Foreign Equity as Capital Expenditure Under Income Tax Act, 1961. Interest on Share Application Money Cannot Be Adjusted Against Such Capital Expenditure.

The case involves an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) at the ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case: Investment in Shares of Private Company for Acquiring Control Held as Capital Asset, Not Stock-in-Trade. Shares held for 31 months with transfer restrictions cannot be treated as trading asset under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Accra Investments Private Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 25 April 2012 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Slump Sale Case. Transfer of IMFL Business as Going Concern Not Subject to Capital Gains Tax Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)...