KAHC010131542020_1
22 Apr 2024The matter arose from two writ petitions filed by M/s. Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Corporation Limited, a Government company engaged in electric...
Search Results for "dissolved firm"
248 result(s) found
Found 248 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Tenancy and Partnership Dispute Under U.P. Urban Buildings Act and Partnership Act. The Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of a review application, noting partnership dissolution upon partners' deaths but not altering the tenancy outcome based on deemed vacancy provisions.
10 Aug 2021The dispute originated from an application filed in July 1982 by Pradeep Kumar, the successor-in-interest of tenant Tika Ram, before the Rent Control ...
- 327
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Refusal to Reject Plaint in Suit for Conveyance and Amenities. Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Claim for Conveyance is Continuing Cause of Action Not Barred by Limitation.
28 Jan 2021The case involves a civil revision application filed by the applicants (defendants in the suit) challenging the order of the learned Senior Civil Judg...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Amend Plaint After 14 Years. Amendment Sought to Introduce New Case of Fraud and Collusion Rejected as Barred by Limitation and Laches.
30 Nov 2010The appeal arose from a suit for partition and declaration filed by the appellant, Minakshi Mahendra Pitroda, against the respondents. The suit proper...
- 116
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act Case Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Over Third-Party Rights. The competent authority under Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 exceeded its jurisdiction by granting deemed conveyance of property not covered by flat purchase agreements, affecting appellant's rights allotted under a dissolution deed.
21 Apr 2025The dispute arose from a partnership firm dissolution in 1987, where a larger plot was partitioned between Lalbhai H. Shah (predecessor of respondents...
- 376
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Injunction Under Section 96 CPC; Appeal Filed by Purchaser Under Agreement to Sell. Trial Court Had Dismissed Suit for Lack of Title and Non-Joinder of Parties Despite Long Possession Claim.
19 Jan 2026The dispute concerned a suit property being Final Plot No.129 of Town Planning Scheme No.22, Paldi, Ahmedabad, admeasuring 1204 square yards after exc...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Applications for Appointment of Arbitrator in Partnership Disputes Involving Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner. The Court held that the arbitration clause in the partnership deed is binding on the legal representatives of the deceased partner, and the applicants being daughters and legal heirs are entitled to invoke arbitration.
6 Jun 2022The judgment concerns four applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Priya Rishi Bhuta and another, who ar...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale of Land Due to Limitation and Lack of Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff's claim for 15% share in property fails as suit filed beyond limitation period and plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform his part of contract.
19 Oct 2012The plaintiff, Kantilal Vasanji Chheda, filed a suit in 1994 seeking a declaration that an agreement dated 10th April 1981 for purchase of an open plo...
- 50
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Implead Legal Representatives in Partition Suit — Held That Application Under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC Was Not Maintainable as Defendant No.2 Was Already on Record and No Abatement Had Occurred
8 Sep 2025The petitioner, Sri Janardhana Suvarna, was Defendant No.2 in O.S.No.233/2016, a suit for partition and separate possession filed by Respondent No.1 (...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over 'Neel' Mark — Family Dispute Over Use of Mark Between Partnership Firms. Registered Proprietor of Mark 'Neel' Succeeds in Showing Prima Facie Case of Infringement Under Sections 28 and 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999, and Passing Off, Despite Family Relationship and Alleged Family Arrangement.
24 Jun 2014The Plaintiffs, partnership firms and individuals, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, alleging unauthoriz...
- 123
