Search Results for "detention order challenge"

636 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 636 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Reproduction of Grounds. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Relevant Documents Not Supplied.

The petitioner, Jitendra @ Tiger Umaji Pawar, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Based on Single Criminal Case Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Possibility of Bail and Continued Dangerous Activities.

The petitioner, Mohsin Anwar Khan @ Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 24th February 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Activist in UAPA Case for Failure to File Charge Sheet Within 90 Days. The court held that the right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is indefeasible and the period of house arrest cannot be excluded from the computation of the 90-day period.

The appellant, Gautam P. Navlakha, a 69-year-old scholar, writer, and civil rights activist, was arrested on 28/10/2018 in connection with FIR No. 4 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PASA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Lapses. Detenu's Preventive Detention Set Aside as Subjective Satisfaction Was Not Properly Recorded and Grounds of Detention Were Not Communicated in Time.

The petitioner, Nitin Bhimabhai Patel, was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (PASA Act) by orders dated 14/03/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Relevant Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 2nd April 2009 passed by respondent no.2 under Section 3(1) of the Conserv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 10 Months Between Release on Bail and Detention Order Held to Snap Live Link, Vitiating Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA, 1974.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Shyam Dharmadas Amlani, challenged the detention order dated 15th October 2005 passed by the State Government under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Retracted Statement Not Considered. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Retraction of Confession.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Iqbal Yusuf Suleman, challenged the detention order dated 20.4.2004 passed by the detaining authority under Section...