Search Results for "delivery of possession"

114 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Cost Escalation by Development Authority in Consumer Dispute — Clause 7 of Allotment Letter Permitted Price Revision. The Court held that the allotment was not a fixed price contract and the authority acted fairly by granting interest on deposits.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 8 November 2017, which had directed the Visakhap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal as Abated Due to Non-Substitution of Legal Heirs of Deceased Appellant in Property Title Suit. Appeal Abates Entirely When Deceased Appellant's Interest is Inseparable from Co-Appellants, Rendering Inconsistent Decrees Impossible.

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals filed by the defendants/appellants against the judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh which had co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Case to High Court for Fresh Hearing Due to Jurisdictional Error in Deciding Application Under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC. High Court Failed to Follow Settled Precedents on Admission of Additional Evidence in Appeal.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the legal representatives of the original defendants against the common judgment of the High Court of J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Lease Dispute Over Requirement of Notice Under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act. Tenant at Sufferance Does Not Require Notice for Eviction Under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The dispute concerns a plot of land in Siliguri, West Bengal, leased by the appellant to the respondent for 15 years under an unregistered indenture d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Developer's Appeal in Part, Reducing Interest Rate on Refund for Delayed Possession of Row House. Buyer's Agreement's One-Sided Clause on Delay Interest Does Not Preclude Claim for Reasonable Compensation; Refund Upheld but Interest Reduced from 12% to 9%.

The case involves a dispute between Kolkata West International City Pvt Ltd (the developer/appellant) and Devasis Rudra (the buyer/respondent) arising...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Interest Rate to 9% in Consumer Disputes Against Developer for Delayed Possession. The Court upheld deficiency in service but reduced interest from 15% to 9% per annum, following earlier precedent in Himanshu Arora case.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from consumer complaints against DLF Homes Panchkula (P) Ltd. regarding its residential proje...