Search Results for "corruption charges"

916 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 916 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Gopal Ambadas Gawali, a Police Head Constable, charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Acquittal in Prevention of Corruption Case Due to Hostile Complainant and Plausible Defence. Foundational Facts of Demand and Acceptance Not Established as Complainant Admitted Receiving Full Entitlement and That Disputed Amount Was His Own Contribution.

This criminal appeal was filed by the State of Maharashtra through the Anti-Corruption Bureau against the acquittal of Anandrao Rajaram Patil, a Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ramdas Waman Tadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, in Special (A.C.B.) Case No. 01 of 2008 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ramdas Waman Tadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, in Special (A.C.B.) Case No. 01 of 2008 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prior sanction under Section 19 was not obtained and trap witnesses were not independent.

The case involves two appeals against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Dr. Nishikant Bhaskarrao Kulkarni (sinc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unreliable Trap Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Asaram Dhansing Umre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad, in Special Case No.5 of 1998 under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Madhav Bhalchandra Rajurkar, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, for demanding and accepti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sewakdas Tukaram Jumde, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of t...