Search Results for "civil suit challenging arbitration"

655 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 655 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(b) of Arbitration Act Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Hotel Management Dispute. Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Respondents from Interfering with Appellant's Management of Hotel Pending Arbitration.

The appellant, Royal Orchid Associated Hotels Private Limited, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Concil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Referral to Arbitration Despite Fraud Allegations in Development Agreement Dispute. Arbitration Clause Survives Challenge When Fraud Relates to Inducement Not Affecting Contractual Terms.

The appeal arose from a civil suit filed by Deccan Paper Mills Co. Ltd. (appellant) against Regency Mahavir Properties and others (respondents) seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award in Land Sale Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Petition Cannot Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence and That Award Was Not Perverse.

The case involves an arbitration appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgment of the Principal Dist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Unconditional Stay of Arbitral Award in Favour of State Government. Order XXVII Rule 8A CPC Does Not Mandate Unconditional Stay; Court Must Impose Conditions Under Section 36(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case arises from a dispute between PAM Developments Private Ltd. (appellant) and the State of West Bengal (respondent) concerning a tender for roa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Challenging Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Property Dispute. Court holds that appointment of arbitrator by consent of parties is valid and cannot be challenged under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment pertains to two arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioners in Arbitratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Single Judge's Ruling on Lack of Jurisdiction in Section 34 Petition — Seat of Arbitration Determines Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 2(1)(e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who held that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain a petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ex-Parte Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Dispute. Court holds that non-participation in arbitration despite notice and failure to prove fraud or bias does not warrant setting aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, The Loot (India) Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, were borrowers and guarantors who had taken a loan from Reliance Capital Limited (the f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Non-Compliance with Section 69 of Indian Partnership Act and Bar of Res Judicata. Suit by unregistered partnership firm held not maintainable; subsequent suit for same cause of action without withdrawing earlier suit also barred.

The plaintiff, Jayesh Pandya, a real estate broker, conducted business under the name 'Pandya & Shah Associates', which was an unregistered partnershi...