Search Results for "bail rule jail exception"

490 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 490 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance — Detention Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 Set Aside as Mechanical and Without Application of Mind

The petitioner, Anand Ramanji Abhaji Thakor, was preventively detained by an order dated 04.02.2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under PITNDPS Act for Lack of Material Linking to Public Order. Single FIR and bail rejection insufficient to justify 'Illicit Traffic' under Section 2(e) of Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Raydhanbhai Valjibhai Gabhu, through his brother Jayesh Valjibhai Gabu, challenged a preventive detention order dated 11.12.2025 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act Due to Insufficient Impact on Public Order. Detention Based on Five Criminal Cases Under Section 304(2) BNS Found Inadequate to Establish Prejudice to Public Order Under Section 2(c) of the Act.

The case involved a petition challenging a preventive detention order passed under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. The det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Public Order Impact — Single Criminal Case and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Establish Detriment to Public Order.

The petitioner, Nilesh Sunil Pendulkar, challenged an order dated 06.10.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahmednagar, under Section 3(1) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petitions Challenging Judicial Custody Beyond 15 Days Under Section 309(2) Cr.P.C. — Remand Orders Not Vitiated as Petitioners Failed to Show Prejudice or Illegality.

The petitioners, Harshad Dinanath Bari and Ravindra Vasudev Bari & Ors., were accused in Boisar police station C.R. No. I-267/2017 (MPID Case No. 2 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...