Search Results for "age discrepancy"

511 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 511 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dhanaji Rambhau Satpute, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of his wife Pratibha under Sections 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Conviction for Employing Child Labour in Tailor Shop. Conviction under Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961 for employing two children below 14 years as helpers upheld.

The petitioner, Sri A M Samiulla, owned a tailor shop named 'Gents Select Tailors' in Gandhinagar, Bangalore. On 27 January 2006, the Senior Labour In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for possession based on title and prior possession; appellate court refused to re-appreciate evidence in second appeal under Section 100 CPC.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendant No.1 challenging the judgment and decree passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.238 of 1987 b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO Case for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor — Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2) IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Devanand Rajabhau More, was convicted by the Special Court, Ambajogai, in Special POCSO Case No. 4/2014 for offences under Sections 363...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence on Age of Victim. Consent of Victim Above 16 Years Renders Sexual Intercourse Not Rape Under Section 376 IPC.

The appellant, Ashok Pande, was convicted under Section 376 IPC for rape of a minor girl, Latiba (PW2), and sentenced to seven years rigorous imprison...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Age. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 and Consent Was Voluntary.

The appellant, Parvesh Bagde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ombudsman Report in Seniority Dispute — Seniority Determined by Date of Joining, Not Date of Recommendation by Public Service Commission.

The petitioners, including Maya M. Pednekar and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the report dated 16.02.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from three criminal appeals filed against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga, in Sessions Case No. 19/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in House Trespass and Assault Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Complainant Failed to Identify Accused and Medical Evidence Contradicted Allegations of Assault with Sticks Under Sections 452, 326, 324, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 31st May 1999 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Paithan, in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Revision in Rent Control Case for Bonafide Requirement. Landlord's need for premises for himself, aged parents, and children held bonafide under Section 31F of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The case involves four Civil Revision Applications under Section 31F of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, arising fro...