Search Results for "VAT Department"

210 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 210 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions of Granite Dealer in VAT/CST Case — No Substantial Question of Law. Assessee failed to prove inter-State stock transfer; Tribunal's concurrent findings of fact upheld under Section 65(1) of KVAT Act, 2003.

The petitioner, M/s. Shanthakoti Enterprises, a dealer engaged in extraction and sale of rough granite blocks from quarries in Chamarajanagar, filed r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds TDS Provisions Under Goa VAT Act for Works Contracts — Rule 4A and Entry C-14 Held Valid. Amendment to Section 28(1) of Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005 for deduction of tax at source from payments to contractors is constitutionally valid and not ultra vires.

The petitioners, including the All Goa Contractors Association and four contractor companies, challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 4A insert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Local Body Tax Classification. Classification of dealers based on turnover for LBT exemption is valid under Article 14 as it has a rational nexus with the object of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

The petitioners, M/s. Nagpur Distillers Private Limited and M/s. Vidarbha Distillers, are dealers within the meaning of Section 2(16A) of the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Reassessment Order Under KVAT Act for Non-Disclosure of Items in Return. Assessee Failed to Submit Reply Despite Multiple Opportunities, Leading to Confirmation of Tax Liability of Rs.14,27,48,346/-.

The appellant, M/s Cargotec India Private Limited, is an assessee under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act). The dispute pertains to th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Revision in KVAT Case — Tribunal's Factual Finding on Stock Transfer Not Interfered With. Section 65 of KVAT Act, 2003 does not permit re-appreciation of evidence unless perversity is shown.

The State of Karnataka, represented by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, filed a revision petition under Section 65 of the Karnataka Value Added T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Case. Settlement Commission's order upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962 granting immunity from interest.

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Customs, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...