Search Results for "State Minority Commission"

243 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 243 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Beyond Reasonable Doubt as Victim's Testimony Was Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Kadamban, was convicted by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in S.C. No. 274/2012 for offences under Sections 366A (kidn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Conflict on Taxability of Tobacco Products to Constitution Bench for Clarification on Precedent Doctrine. Dispute Involves Whether Pan Masala Containing Tobacco Covered Under Additional Duties of Excise Act, 1957 is Exempt from State Sales Tax Under Various State Enactments.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning the taxability of pan masala containing tobacco and gutka under various State sales tax act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Externment Order in Maharashtra Police Act Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Evidence. Externment Order Under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Found Legally Unsustainable as Based on Vague Allegations and Pending Criminal Cases Challenged as Malicious.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, which dismissed a criminal writ petition challenging an externment orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Rape and Murder of Two-Year-Old Child. The court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC, Section 376A IPC, and Section 6 of POCSO Act, finding the crime to be in the 'rarest of rare' category.

The case involves the confirmation of a death sentence and an appeal against conviction for the rape and murder of a two-year-old child. The incident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court Holds That Evidence in Parsi Divorce Suits May Be Recorded Before a Commissioner Under CPC Order 18 Rule 4(2) — Section 46 of Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936 Does Not Mandate In-Court Recording with Delegates.

The case involved a suit filed under the Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936, by Rohinton Panthaky against Armin R. Panthaky. During the proceedings, a...