Search Results for "Section 31(4)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 31(4)"

526 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 526 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Possession of Auctioned Property — Bank Not Obligated to Deliver Vacant Possession Under SARFAESI Act. SARFAESI Act, 2002 Section 13(4) and Section 17 — Auction Sale Confirmed in Favor of Petitioner, but Bank Delivered Only Symbolic Possession; Petitioner's Remedy Lies Before DRT Under Section 17.

16 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Mr. Suresh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions of Selected Driver Trainees Against NWKRTC, Holding They Are Not Workmen Under Industrial Disputes Act. Court Rules That Selected Candidates Undergoing Training Without Appointment Order or Remuneration Do Not Attain Status of Workman Under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

25 Apr 2024

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Charity Commissioner’s Sanction for Sale of Trust Property. Court’s Determination Not Included in the Provided Judgment Fragment.

11 Dec 2019

The matter arose from an application filed by the trustees of a registered public trust before the Charity Commissioner seeking prior sanction for sal...

High Court

KAHC010479002008_1

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order in Transport Department Recruitment Matter. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution Seek Quashing of Tribunal's Decision Dated 02.03.2010.

23 Sep 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in TDS Dispute with MMRDA. Court holds that payments made by MMRDA to contractors for construction of metro rail project are not subject to TDS under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the contracts are not 'works contracts' but for supply of materials and services.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for the a...

High Court

High Court Adjudicates Public Interest Petition Against Ministerial Orders on Land Reservation for Pune Telephones and Cooperative Housing Societies. The Court Considers Legality of Compromise Order and Subsequent Land Acquisition Proceedings in Light of Development Plan and ULC Act Provisions.

24 Apr 2006

The petitioners, residents of Pune, filed a public interest petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 6.2.1991 (a com...

High Court

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1659 OF 2005

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)