Search Results for "Section 304A"

144 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation for death of breadwinner under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves two appeals: MFA No.233/2021 filed by the claimants (legal representatives of the deceased S.B. Yeshwant) seeking enhancement of com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Death of Driver in Road Accident Held to Arise Out of and in Course of Employment. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Lack of Written Contract, and Commissioner's Dismissal Set Aside.

The appellant, Smt. Puttamma, mother of deceased Prakash, filed a claim petition before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation (the Tribunal) see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals in Motor Accident Claims — Negligence of Maruti Van Driver Upheld. Compensation Awarded to Legal Heirs of Deceased Rider and Injured Pillion Riders Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves three appeals filed by The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against judgments and awards of the Claims Tribunal, Raigad, in three motor ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Liable Despite Invalid Driving Licence Due to Lack of Owner's Knowledge. Employer Not Required to Verify Licence Validity for Transport Vehicle When Driver Produced Licence.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Chandrapur, in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 120/2006. The deceas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case Due to Lack of Criminal Intent. Section 304 IPC not attracted as negligence was not gross or reckless, and death occurred during medical procedure without mens rea.

The applicant, Dr. Sangeeta Salunke, a registered medical practitioner, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation for Death of 15-Year-Old Boy Due to Contributory Negligence. Owner of Tractor Held Liable for Negligence of Driver but Compensation Reduced by 50% for Deceased's Contributory Negligence in Sitting on Tractor.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the original claimants (respondents No. 1 to 4) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence Established by Involvement of Vehicle. Claimants Awarded Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Death of Deceased in Road Accident.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, who are the widow, minor son, and mother of the deceased Prakash Deorao Patil, against the judgment and order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Unlawful Assembly and Rioting Case — No Prima Facie Case of Murder Made Out. Court Held That Section 302 IPC Is Not Attracted as There Was No Common Intention to Kill and the Death Was Caused by a Single Blow During a Sudden Fight.

The judgment pertains to three criminal applications filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking anticipatory bail in con...