Search Results for "Safeguard Duty"

1176 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1176 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Detention Order Under Goonda Act in Favor of Detenue's Wife Due to Procedural Violations. Preventive Detention Invalid for Failure to Follow Section 8 Safeguards and Provide Effective Representation Under Article 22(5).

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed by Smt. B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petition Against Coercive Recovery of Service Tax Without Adjudication, Examining Scope of Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994. The Court Considers Whether Revenue Can Take Steps Under Section 87 Absent Determination of Tax Liability Through Statutory Adjudication Process.

The petitioner, ICICI Bank Ltd., a scheduled bank, challenged a communication dated 25/3/2015 issued by the Service Tax authorities demanding interest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-supply of Translated Documents. Detention Order Held Violative of Article 22(5) as Kannada Translations of Relied-upon Court Order Sheets Were Not Furnished, Precluding Effective Representation.

The case arose from a habeas corpus petition filed by Smt. Jayamma, the mother of detenu Ravikumar @ Kumara @ Tango, challenging a preventive detentio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Magistrate's Order Directing Registration of FIR Under Section 175(3) BNSS Against MIDC Employee in Plot Allotment Case — Held That Magistrate Must Apply Judicial Mind and Not Pass Mechanical Orders Under Section 175(3) BNSS.

The petitioner, Namrata Subhash Pawar, an Assistant in MIDC, challenged the order dated 31.05.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Letter of Credit Dispute in Common Judgment for Two Suits Arising from Alleged Discrepant Documents. Bank's Liability for Wrongful Debit Examined Under UCP 290 with Emphasis on Strict Compliance and Discrepancy in Shipping Documents.

Two suits were filed arising from a documentary import Letter of Credit facility granted by State Bank of India to Dadlani Silk Stores. Suit No. 1012 ...