Search Results for "SEBI jurisdiction"

230 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 230 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Investigation into Financial Crimes by Corporate Entities and Public Officials. Court holds that a writ petition for registration of FIR is not maintainable when petitioner is not an aggrieved person and has alternative remedy under Section 156(3) CrPC.

The petitioner, Alpesh Navinchandra Gosalia, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Consent Terms Recording Satisfaction of Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable. Execution of Arbitral Award Governed by Arbitration Act, Not Commercial Courts Act; Appeals Confined to Section 37 of Arbitration Act.

The Bombay High Court dismissed three commercial appeals filed by Usha Kakade, Sanjay Kakade, and Kakade Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. against an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Honouring of F&O Contracts and Conversion of Mutual Funds in SEBI vs IL&FS Securities Services Ltd. Interim orders passed to protect interests of parties pending final adjudication.

The Supreme Court heard appeals concerning interim directions in a matter involving the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and IL&FS Securi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Alleging FDI Violations in Insurance Sector as Motivated by Personal Interest. Petitioner's failure to disclose material facts and filing of multiple petitions with similar allegations leads to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Sambhaji Savakar Jadhav, filed three public interest litigation petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Broker's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Client Dispute Over Delay Paying Charges. Unilateral Charging of 2% Daily Interest Without Specific Agreement or Proof of Loss Held Unconscionable and Not Enforceable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a dispute between Sharekhan Limited, a trading member/broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), and Nita Thakkar, a client. The bro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute for Lack of Reasons and Non-Consideration of Margin Requirements. Award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 set aside as Arbitrator failed to consider deposit and margin obligations of client.

The Petitioner, Anand Rathi Share and Stock Brokers Ltd., a share and stock broker and member of NSE, challenged an arbitral award dated 15 October 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...