Search Results for "Recruitment Rules"

Trending :

Search Results for "Recruitment Rules"

112 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 112 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Promotion Dispute — Continuous Service Under Recruitment Rules Must Be Actual Service, Not Deemed Date. The Court held that the deemed date of promotion under Seniority Rules cannot be treated as actual continuous service for eligibility under Recruitment Rules, quashing the promotion of Respondent No. 3 to Section Officer.

10 May 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Girish Kumar against the judgment of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) which had upheld the promo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in OAS Recruitment Case — No Right Accrues from Mere Recommendation. Mere recommendation for promotion does not confer a vested right; abolition of cadre and repeal of rules extinguishes any claim.

3 May 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Orissa against the judgment of the Orissa High Court which had directed the State to conve...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Amended Recruitment Rules Equating Posts of Principal and Joint Chief Inspector of Factories as Infructuous Due to Retirement of Employee. Transfer Order Set Aside as Mala Fide; Period Between Transfer and Superannuation Treated as Dies Non.

1 May 2019

The case involves appeals by the Union of India against a common judgment of the Madras High Court confirming orders of the Central Administrative Tri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Irregularly Appointed Forest Officers in Seniority Dispute. Appointments Beyond Advertised Vacancies Held Illegal, Seniority Counts Only From Regularisation Date.

22 Apr 2019

The case pertains to the seniority of Assistant Conservators of Forests (ACFs) in the Bihar Forest Service. The appellants were appointed on 13.04.198...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Among Promoted Officers in Telecommunications Engineering Service. ROTA Rule Not Applicable Where Statutory Recruitment Rules Do Not Provide for Rotation of Vacancies Between Quota Streams.

2 Apr 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute over the inter se seniority of Sub-Divisional Engineers (SDEs) in the Telecommunications Engineering Service (Group 'B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

5 Mar 2019

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Mandamus Directing Finalization of RPF as Organized Service. In-Principle Approval by DoPT Was Conditional and Subject to Cadre Review Committee Approval, Which Was Not Granted.

1 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Delhi High Court that had directed the governmen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

29 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Partially Blind Candidate for Civil Judge Post — Condition of 40%-50% Disability Held Invalid Under Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. The Court held that restriction on disability percentage for identified posts must be based on expert committee determination, not arbitrary government decision.

22 Jan 2019

The appellant, a practicing advocate with 70% visual impairment, applied for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Tamil Nadu pursuant to a not...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Recruitment Dispute, Holds No Indefeasible Right to Appointment After Cancellation of Selection Due to Financial Crisis. The Court set aside High Court's direction to declare results of 1999 selection and appoint respondents as Junior System Assistants, finding the State's policy decision to cancel selections was bona fide.

17 Jan 2019

The State of Manipur and another appealed against a judgment of the High Court of Manipur which directed the declaration of results of a selection for...

9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)