Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

917 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 917 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution and Consideration of Representation. Delay of Over Five Months in Executing Detention Order and Three Months in Considering Representation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act.

2 Feb 2005

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mohd. Kunhi Kallattra, challenged a detention order dated 28.2.2002 issued by the Secretary (Preventive Detenti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Releases Detainee in Preventive Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Consideration of Representation. State Government's Failure to Expeditiously Consider and Independently Assess Detenu's Representation Before Advisory Board Reference Violated Article 22(5) of the Constitution and Section 7 of Preventive Detention Act, 1950.

5 Nov 1969

The Supreme Court addressed a habeas corpus petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the preventive detention of the petitioner under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind to Witness Statements. The court held that the detaining authority failed to properly consider in-camera statements, violating the detenu's right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

14 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Ravi Hanumant Thorat, brother-in-law of the detenu Sahadeo @ Sada Laxman Dhavare, challenged the validity of a preventive detention or...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in NDPS Case for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(e) of PITNDPS Act, 1988 set aside as mere involvement in illicit traffic without affecting public order does not justify preventive detention.

23 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Kazimali @ Wasim Yunusali @ Saiyedsaab Saiyed, filed a petition through his brother-in-law challenging a preventive detention order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Public Order Impact — Single Criminal Case and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Establish Detriment to Public Order.

29 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Nilesh Sunil Pendulkar, challenged an order dated 06.10.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahmednagar, under Section 3(1) of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Inordinate and Unexplained Delay of 7 Months Between Arrest and Issuance of Detention Order Vitiated the Order Under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974.

9 Jul 2015

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mohammed Aboobaker, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a preventi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Preventive Detention Order; Holds That Representation Made After Advisory Board’s Opinion Does Not Violate Section 7 of Preventive Detention Act, 1950. Acts Affecting Public Order Under Section 3 Must Impact the Community at Large, Not Mere Law and Order.

4 Aug 1969

The petitioner, Shyamal Chakraborty, was arrested and detained under Section 3(2) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, by an order of the Commission...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu in Custody Without Imminent Release Possibility. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Detenu's Judicial Custody and Imminent Bail Possibility Under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act.

6 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Ankush Vaman Pawar, a resident of Pune, was detained at Yerawada Central Prison pursuant to an order dated 12 March 2018 passed by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live Link. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974 Set Aside as Delay Between Last Smuggling Activity and Order Was Unexplained.

21 Mar 2005

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Joshy Mathew, challenged the detention order dated 3rd May 2004 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act on Grounds of In-Camera Statements Not Amounting to Offences. The Court Analyzes Whether In-Camera Statements Require FIR Registration for Treating a Person as a Dangerous Person Under Section 2(b-1) of the MPDA Act and the Per Incuriam Doctrine.

19 Dec 2005

The Bombay High Court heard two criminal writ petitions filed by detenus Mohammed Bilal Hanif Shaikh and Uday Mahadev Sawant challenging their detenti...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)