Search Results for "Plaint rejection"

990 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 990 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Succession Dispute — Declares Appellant as Legal Heir Based on Cohabitation and Public Acknowledgment. Court Holds That Long-Term Cohabitation and Public Recognition as Wife and Son Confer Legal Heirship Status Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a succession dispute where the appellant, L.Arun, filed a suit seeking a declaration that he is the legal heir of the deceased L.Lak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application in HUF Partition Suit — Suit Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose on Alienation by Coparcener.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by Defendant No.6, a third-party purchaser, challenging the rejection of his application under Order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Limitation Bar Not Decided at Plaint Stage. Question of limitation is a mixed question of law and fact requiring trial under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC.

The present appeal arises from a suit filed by the predecessor of respondent Nos. 1(i) to 1(iii) (the plaintiff) against the appellants (defendants) s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Recovery Suit — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The court held that the plaint contained specific averments regarding the contract, bills, and outstanding amount, thus disclosing a cause of action.

The petitioner, M/s Cyrus Marine Services, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging the order dated 02.11.2015 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Order Rejecting Plaint for Non-Prosecution. Court holds that dismissal of suit for default under Order IX Rule 8 CPC is not permissible when the plaintiff's counsel is absent but the defendant is present and ready to proceed.

The appellant, Prabhudayal Pande, filed a First Appeal against an order dated 14.8.2014 passed by the 8th Joint Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Nagpur, in Speci...