Search Results for "POCSO convict"

163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sri. Gangadharappa, was convicted by the I-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapur in Special Sessions Case No.71/2018 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO Case for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault on 9-Year-Old Boy. Court holds that testimony of child victim alone, if credible, is sufficient for conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Mahesh Sambhaji Chafle, was convicted by the Special Judge, Hingoli, under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Convict in POCSO Case — Emphasizes Furlough as Right, Not Privilege. The court set aside orders rejecting furlough solely on the ground of conviction under POCSO Act, directing reconsideration on merits.

The petitioner, Pintu Uttam Sonale, was convicted for offences under Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5(j)(ii) read with Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 506 IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Mohan Digambar Lokhande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 9 of 2018 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Confirms Conviction but Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Rape and Murder of Minor Girl. Circumstantial evidence including last seen together and failure to explain incriminating circumstances upheld conviction, but mitigating factors led to commutation of death penalty.

The appellant, Vijay Raikwar, was convicted by the Trial Court for the rape and murder of a 7½-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(f) and Section 201 ...