Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act"

730 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 730 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Termination of Anganwadi Sevika for Dual Role as Village Panchayat Member, Declares Government Resolution Unconstitutional and Reinstates with Back Wages

The petitioner, an Anganwadi Sevika appointed in 1996, was elected as a Member of Village Panchayat in 2020 and terminated in 2021 under a Government ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Non-Payment of Tax by Husband/Father-in-Law. Holds That Section 14(1)(j) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Does Not Impose Vicarious Liability for Spouse's Tax Default.

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, through Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh, allowed two writ petitions challenging the disqualification of the petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Village Panchayat Members Challenging Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Mere Registration of Forest Offence Without Conviction Does Not Attract Disqualification.

The petitioners, Raju s/o Mansaram Pawar and his wife Yashoda w/o Raju Pawar, were elected members of the Village Panchayat, Jamdighat, in 2017. Petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order Dismissing No Confidence Motion Dispute for Lack of Hearing. Petitioner's Application Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Dismissed Without Affording Opportunity of Hearing, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Sunil Bhaskar Katkar, was elected as Sarpanch of Belati Grampanchayat in June 2015. On 3rd March 2018, respondent nos.1 to 6 filed an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Process for Gram Panchayat. Court holds that election process once commenced cannot be interfered with under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and the remedy lies in election petition under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioners, Sajid Majid Khan and Babarao Parashram Kandhare (in W.P. No. 3196/2016) and Shaikh Salim Shaikh Madar (in W.P. No. 3420/2016), filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds State Election Commission's Power to Reschedule Panchayat Elections in Flood-Affected Areas. The Court held that the Election Commission's powers under Article 243-K are wide enough to postpone elections due to natural calamity to ensure free and fair elections.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the directions issued by the State Election Commissio...