Search Results for "Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948"

196 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 196 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — Dispute Over Agricultural Land Inheritance and Partition. Court Held That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Remedy Lies Before Civil Court.

The petitioners, eleven individuals from the Jarande family, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a mutation entry (Entry No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to MRT Order on Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings. Earlier Dismissal for Default Does Not Bar Subsequent Proceedings Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948.

The petitioner, Ashish Chandrasingh Jhaveri, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order dated 2nd November, 2018 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Mutation Dispute. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Dispute Over Succession Rights to Agricultural Land Requires Civil Court Adjudication.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Yeshwant Jadhav, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Aurangabad, which set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Trust Property Dispute — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted by Bombay Public Trusts Act. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Maintainable as Dispute Involves Title, Not Just Trust Administration.

The petitioners (original defendants) filed a civil revision application challenging the order of the District Court which set aside the trial court's...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced Due to Inadequate Market Value Assessment. Court Held That Reference Court Erred in Not Considering Comparable Sale Instances and Potential Value of Land for Development Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to a writ petition filed by the legal representatives of the original claimant, Sahadeo Mahadik, challenging the judgment and award ...