Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976"

402 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 402 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Not Validly Taken Under Section 10(6) of ULC Act, 1976. Act of Court Should Not Injure Suitor; Repeal of ULC Act in 2008 Vests Land in Appellant.

The appellant, M/S A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation (now ECE Industries Limited), owned land in Fatehnagar Village, Rangareddy District, Telangan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Batch of Writ Appeals Filed Under Karnataka High Court Act Against Single Judge Order in BDA Matter. The Court’s decision and specific legal findings are not provided in the extracted text.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, constituted by Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice N.S. Sanjay Gowda, heard a batch of writ appeals on 26th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Project Due to Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions. Order of CEO SRA Upheld as Developer Found to Have Violated Terms of Agreement and Failed to Complete Project.

The petitioner, a company engaged as a developer for a slum rehabilitation project on a property owned by a cooperative housing society, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Application in Development Agreement Dispute — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Agreement Was Terminated for Non-Performance. Specific Performance Claim Requires Trial; No Irreparable Loss Shown.

The Plaintiffs, Shantilal J. Shah and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a Development Agreement dated 25th September 2007 and an Irrevoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds MHADA's Order for Repairs and Redevelopment of Cessed Building Under Section 95A of MHADA Act. Court Directs Tenants to Pay Increased Rent and Vacate for Redevelopment, Rejecting Challenge to Executive Engineer's Order.

The appellants, eight tenants of a cessed building in Chittaranjan Nagar, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24 April...