Search Results for "Lokayukta investigation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "Lokayukta investigation"

161 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Proceedings and Contradictory Witness Testimony. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 8 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

2 May 2025

The appellant, Sri. Manjanna M.K., a Head Constable at Bagalagunte Police Station, was convicted by the XXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Overrules PV Narasimha Rao, Holds Bribery Not Protected by Parliamentary Privilege — Legislators Who Accept Bribes for Speech or Vote Are Not Immune from Prosecution Under Articles 105(2) and 194(2) of the Constitution.

4 Mar 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a seven-judge bench decision, overruled its earlier majority judgment in PV Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE) (1998) 4 S...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Revenue Employee in Corruption Case — Demand for Bribe Not Proven. Petitioner, an in-charge Sub-Registrar, was accused of demanding illegal gratification for registering a mortgage deed, but the court found no evidence of demand and held that mere suspicion cannot sustain prosecution under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

16 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Sri P. Manjunath, was an employee of the Revenue Department in the Stamps and Registration wing, holding the substantive post of First...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Revenue Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was declared hostile and prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

12 Feb 2021

The appellant, B. Bhogananjappa, a Revenue Inspector, was convicted by the Special Court and III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Mysuru in Speci...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Long Incarceration. Accused Not Named in FIR and No Direct Evidence of Involvement Under Section 302 IPC.

26 Jul 2019

The petitioners, accused Nos. 1 and 2, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in Crime No. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR and Magistrate Order in Cheating Case — Dispute Held to be Purely Civil in Nature. Allegations of Criminal Breach of Trust and Cheating Under Sections 406, 420 IPC Not Attracted Where Transaction is Civil and No Criminal Intent is Made Out.

5 Apr 2018

The petitioners, five individuals including a widow and her children, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Se...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Directing Filing of Charge Sheet Without Sanction in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is Mandatory Before Cognizance Can Be Taken by Special Judge.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions arising from an order dated 15.03.2008 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Gulbarga, in Special ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIRs Against Former Chief Minister in BDA Denotification Case — CAG Report Cannot Be Sole Basis for Criminal Prosecution Without Independent Investigation. The court held that the CAG report is not a conclusive proof of criminality and cannot be the foundation for criminal prosecution without independent investigation, and that the FIRs were registered without proper sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

5 Jan 2016

The petitioner, Shri B.S. Yeddyurappa, a former Chief Minister of Karnataka, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Sanction Order in Corruption Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by Competent Authority. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 must be granted after proper consideration of all material evidence, not merely based on police report.

7 Apr 2015

The petitioner, a public servant working as Deputy Electrical Inspector, was trapped by Lokayukta Police on 18.12.2010 while allegedly accepting a bri...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR and Cognizance Order in Corruption Case Against Retired IPS Officer — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Court held that taking cognizance without valid sanction is illegal and proceedings are liable to be quashed.

30 Jun 2014

The petitioner, Dr. S. Krishnamurthy, a retired IPS officer, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)