Search Results for "Juvenile Justice Act 2015"

225 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 225 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears State Appeal Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act. Appeal Filed Under Section 378 Cr.P.C. Alleges Erroneous Acquittal for Offences Under Sections 366, 376 IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act.

The State filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the acq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Biological and Adoptive Parents in Guardianship of Unborn Child Case. Unregistered Agreement for Adoption of Unborn Child Held Void and Against Public Policy Under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.

The case involves an appeal filed by four appellants: appellant Nos. 1 and 2 (alleged adoptive parents) and appellant Nos. 3 and 4 (biological parents...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Consensual Relationship. Victim's Age Not Proved Below 18, and Sexual Intercourse Was Consensual, Leading to Acquittal Under Sections 363, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Yadav Chandoba Dawlekar, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.19 of 2015 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Abduction but Acquits of Rape in Case of Minor Girl. State's Appeals for Enhancement and Conviction under Section 376 IPC Dismissed, Accused's Appeal Partly Allowed.

The case involves three appeals arising from a trial court judgment where the accused, Hemant Ashokkumar Mittal, was charged with offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence on Age of Victim. Consent of Victim Above 16 Years Renders Sexual Intercourse Not Rape Under Section 376 IPC.

The appellant, Ashok Pande, was convicted under Section 376 IPC for rape of a minor girl, Latiba (PW2), and sentenced to seven years rigorous imprison...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Age. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 and Consent Was Voluntary.

The appellant, Parvesh Bagde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 of the Indian...