Search Results for "Jharkhand"

218 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 218 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Insanity Defence Under Section 84 IPC and Burden of Proof Under Section 105 Evidence Act. The court held that insanity must be legal, not medical, to exempt from criminal liability, with the accused bearing the burden of proof on a preponderance of probabilities standard.

The judgment involved an appeal where the appellant raised the plea of insanity under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, seeking reversal of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Contradictions in Prosecution Version. Conviction Under Sections 148, 302/149 and 324/149 Indian Penal Code, 1860 Set Aside as Dying Declaration Was Unreliable and Witness Testimony Contradictory.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal challenging the conviction and life imprisonment sentence imposed on the appellants for murder under Sections 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case Due to Moratorium Under IBC. Payment Delay Caused by Legal Disability Under Section 14 IBC, Designated Committee Directed to Accept Payment and Issue Discharge Certificate Under Finance Act, 2019 Scheme.

The dispute arose from the appellant company's inability to pay a settlement amount of Rs.1,24,28,500/- under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court Direction for Regularisation of Contractual Employees. Contractual Appointments in Temporary Project Units Do Not Confer Right to Absorption, and Service Period Under Interim Orders Must Be Excluded from Regularisation Claims.

The dispute arose from the State of Gujarat's appeal against a High Court judgment directing consideration of contractual employees for regularisation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...