KAHC010366622012_1
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "IPC 294"
363 result(s) found
Found 363 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears State's Appeal Against High Court Acquittal of Nine Accused in Dr. Subbiah Murder Case — Conviction and Death Sentences Set Aside by High Court on Conspiracy and Common Intention Charges. High Court Acquitted All Accused Rejecting Prosecution's Evidence on Conspiracy and Murder Under Sections 120-B, 302/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
1 Jan 1970The present criminal appeals arose from the murder of Dr. Subbiah, a reputed doctor at Billroth Hospital, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai. On 14.09.2013,...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Bail to MCOCA Accused in Ahmedabad Bomb Blasts Case Due to Parity with Co-Accused and Long Incarceration Without Trial. Parity with co-accused who were granted bail and prolonged detention without trial justified bail under MCOCA.
23 Jul 2014The applicant, Yasir Sayyed Anis Sayyed @ Hujefa, was accused no.13 in MCOC Special Case No.4 of 2009 pending before the Special Court under the MCOC ...
- 157
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Appeal Against Rejection of Bail in Malegaon Bomb Blast Case. Accused Charged Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and Other Serious Offences Seeks Release Pending Trial.
25 Apr 2017The appeal arose from the rejection of a bail application by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 and the Nati...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order in Criminal Complaint Alleging False Revenue Entry. Court upholds issuance of process against accused for offences under IPC sections 166, 192, 199, 466 r/w 109 based on prima facie evidence of collusion with revenue officials.
14 Jun 2013The petitioner, original accused no.5 in Criminal Case No.259/1986 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sangamner, challenged the order...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Invalid Delegation of Powers. Delegation Order Under Section 3(2) Must Record Satisfaction Based on Material and Reasons; Absence Renders Delegation and Subsequent Detention Orders Invalid.
20 Dec 2022The petitioner, Alakshit Rajesh Ambade, challenged the legality of a preventive detention order dated 02.07.2022 passed by the Commissioner of Police,...
- 76
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR and Charge Sheet in SC/ST Atrocities Case for Lack of Intent to Humiliate in Public View. Allegations of Caste-Based Abuse and Assault Failed to Disclose Essential Ingredients Under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act, 1989.
17 Jan 2023The petitioner, Sri Shailesh Kumar V., filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashment of FIR N...
- 161
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in MCOCA Case Due to Lack of Satisfactory Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under MCOCA and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove unlawful assembly and common object beyond reasonable doubt.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to multiple criminal appeals arising from a single incident where a group of individuals allegedly formed an unlawful assembly a...
- 150
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder by Burning Wife with Diesel. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as dying declaration, motive evidence, and medical testimony established homicidal death.
24 Jul 2019The appellant, Adawayya @ Swami Kuntainawar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, for the murder of his wife by pouring diesel on h...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as evidence of victim was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.
18 Feb 2021The appellant, Mr. Sayyad Chand Agasapure, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i)(n) of the Ind...
- 35
