Search Results for "Habeas Corpus Petition"

404 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 404 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition After Minor Detenue Secured and Handed Over to Mother. POCSO Act Case Registered Against Third Respondent Following Allegations of Illegal Detention of 17-Year-Old Girl.

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court heard a habeas corpus petition filed by a mother seeking to secure the custody of her 17-year-old minor daughte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes Habeas Corpus Petition for Detenu with Low IQ, Appoints District Collector as Interim Guardian to Protect Property. Court directs protection of detenu's property and welfare, appointing District Collector as guardian under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Ganesan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking production of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Preventive Detention Order Due to Lack of Proximity Between Adverse Cases and Ground Case. Preventive Detention Act Invoked Unnecessarily When Ordinary Law Sufficed.

The petitioner, Velu, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the deten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Preventive Detention Order — Mere Criminal Involvement Not Ground for Preventive Detention. Preventive detention order set aside as the detenu's cases could be dealt with under ordinary law, and preventive detention cannot be used for punishment.

The petitioner, Uma, mother of the detenu Logesh, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention. Delay of 38 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Matheshwari, mother of the detenu Jeganraj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Job Racketing Case. Court holds that prolonged preventive detention can be substituted by ordinary criminal proceedings under police investigation.

The petitioner, K.V. Santosh, son of the detenu G. Lakshmi, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order Based on Solitary Ground Case. Preventive detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 held unsustainable as ordinary criminal law is sufficient to deal with the case.

The petitioner, Angayi Kanakarathinam, mother of the detenu Ranganathan alias Rangarajan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Unexplained delay of 37 days snaps the 'live and proximate link' between grounds of detention and purpose of detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Sarojini, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order dated 29.07.20...