Search Results for "General Provident Fund Rules"

300 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 300 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Insurance Company, Holds Mediclaim Amount Not Deductible from Motor Accident Compensation. Contractual Insurance Benefit Is Independent of Statutory Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and Cannot Be Deducted to Avoid Double Recovery.

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the question whether amounts received by a claimant under a Mediclaim policy are deductible from the compe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CMA NO.2543 OF 2018

The dispute arose over the legal heirship and terminal benefits of deceased Sundaramoorthy, who worked as a clerk in the Corporation of Chennai and di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence of Truck Driver Established, Contributory Negligence Not Proved. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation with 6% interest per annum from date of petition.

The judgment arises from two cross-appeals against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangli, dated 28 September 2005 in Claim Petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by National Institute of Industrial Engineering Challenging Trade Union Registration. State Government Held as Appropriate Government for NITIE Under Section 2(a) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Allowing Union Registration Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE) challenging the order of the Industrial Court, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Gratuity from Date of Retirement in Corruption Case Acquittal. Interest under Section 7(3A) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is payable from retirement date, not acquittal date, as gratuity becomes due on retirement regardless of pending criminal prosecution.

The petitioner, Vinodkumar Narayan Dixit, a former Deputy Collector, retired on 1st April 1997 while a criminal prosecution under the Prevention of Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired KVIC Employee Challenging Withdrawal of Pension and Recovery of Paid Pension. Pension is a Right, Not a Bounty, and Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Statutory Authority Under Regulation 15 of KVIC Employees Pension Regulations 1984.

The petitioner, A.K. Kumaran Nair, joined the U.P. Khadi and Village Industries Board on 15 June 1982. The Board was taken over by the Khadi and Villa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Deputy Manager in Indian Airlines Case Due to Lapsed Regulations and Violation of Natural Justice. Regulation 13 of Indian Airlines Service Regulations Held Void for Absence of Enquiry and Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Prabha D. Kannan, a former Deputy Manager (In Flight Services) of Indian Airlines Ltd., challenged her termination from service by an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Widow's Petition for Family Pension Due to Limitation and Lack of Option by Deceased Employee. The court held that the petitioner's claim for family pension was barred by limitation and that the deceased husband had not opted for pension under the Railway Pension Scheme.

The petitioner, Smt. Anusayabai Pawalaji Bhalerao, is the widow of a deceased railway employee who served from 2nd June 1943 until his death on 2nd Oc...