Search Results for "Explanatory Amendment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Explanatory Amendment"

238 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 238 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Rigid Frame Columns Are Steel Structurals Classifiable Under Section 14(iv)(v) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Schedule Entry C-55(v) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Court examines the classification of pre-fabricated building components and the interpretation of 'steel structurals' in commercial parlance.

23 Dec 2016

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC After Judgment of Conviction. Trial Court Cannot Summon Additional Accused After Pronouncing Judgment as It Becomes Functus Officio.

5 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court considered the appeal against the summoning of Sukhpal Singh Khaira as an additional accused under Section 319 CrPC after the trial ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal Against High Court's Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Dispute Involves Interpretation of Contractual Notice Requirement as Condition Precedent and Applicability of Waiver and Estoppel in EPC Contract.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from multiple Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) agreements between SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation (con...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Summary Judgment in Recovery Suit Against DDA for Refund of Sale Consideration After Land Acquisition Lapses. The Court held that DDA cannot retain the money after failing to convey title due to lapsing of acquisition, and the suit was within limitation.

29 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Delhi High Court's order dismissing the appellant's application for summary judgment under Order XIII...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Slum Rehabilitation Area Declaration Where No Show Cause Notice Was Issued. The Court Examines Whether Principles of Natural Justice Require Opportunity of Hearing Before Section 3C(1) Declaration Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

11 May 2011

This writ petition was filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the declaration of certain property as a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C(1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Reproduction of Grounds. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Relevant Documents Not Supplied.

20 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Jitendra @ Tiger Umaji Pawar, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boot...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Determines Factual Enquiry Whether Share Transfer Resulted in Members Exceeding Fifty. Enquiry Directed by Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014 Following Dispute Over Validity of Pre-emption Rights in Articles of Association.

4 Aug 2017

The appeal was placed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay following a remand order by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014. Th...

High Court

High Court Quashes Pre-Execution Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Violation of Statutory Safeguards. Order Passed Under Section 3(i) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 Set Aside Because No Steps Were Taken to Serve the Order or Grounds and Material.

30 Sep 2013

The petitioner, a businessman and proprietor of J.J. Enterprises engaged in importing mobile accessories, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Accumulated Input Tax Credit Under Inverted Duty Structure in GST — Rejection by Authorities Set Aside. Held that refund of unutilized ITC is admissible under Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST Act, 2017 even when output supply is partially exempt, and that the formula under Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 must be applied correctly.

23 Apr 2026

The petitioner, CHEC-TPL Line 4 Joint Venture, a joint venture between TATA Projects Limited and another entity, was engaged in the construction of a ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Interplay Between Section 17A and Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 156(3) CrPC in Context of Prior Approval for Investigation Against Public Servants. The court framed questions of law regarding the necessity of prior approval under Section 17A PC Act even after a Magistrate's order under Section 156(3) CrPC, and the stage at which sanction under Section 19 PC Act is required in private complaints.

21 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court was hearing a petition arising from a complaint filed against a former Chief Minister of Karnataka alleging corruption under the Pre...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)