Search Results for "Domestic Violence Act, 2005"

415 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 415 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Compensation Under Domestic Violence Act — Mental Torture and Emotional Distress Constitute Injuries Under Section 22 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Acquittal Under Section 498-A IPC Does Not Bar Civil Remedy Under D.V. Act.

The case involves two criminal writ petitions and connected applications arising from proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Husband and Relatives Challenging Maintenance Order Under DV Act — Shared Household Definition Includes Property of Relatives, Valid Marriage Not Required for Protection.

The respondent, Vaishali Subhash Chaware, filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Interim Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act — Prior Maintenance Order Does Not Bar Additional Relief Under DV Act. Economic Violence Found as Domestic Violence Under Section 3 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The applicant, Deepak Mahaveerprasad Gupta, filed a criminal revision application challenging the interim orders passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...