Search Results for "Deputy Tahsildar"

593 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 593 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Proceedings Initiated Without Jurisdiction in Writ Petition Under Articles 226 and 227. Upa-Lokayukta lacked authority to act on private complaint without government reference under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984.

The petitioner, Sri M.V. Srinivasa Gowda, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Land Reforms Act Case — Tenancy Rights Not Established Due to Lack of Evidence of Cultivation. Land Tribunal's Order Based on Surrender Deemed Invalid as Surrender by Non-Tenant Has No Legal Effect Under Section 48-A of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants challenging the order of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Removal of Obstruction on Government Road Under Mamlatdar Courts' Act. Sub Divisional Officer's order directing removal of obstruction on a Government road upheld as road existed and obstruction was created by petitioners.

The petitioners, owners of land Survey No. 624, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Sub Divisional Officer, Khamgaon, dated 20.06.2016,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction — First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Adverse Possession Claim Fails as Appellants Failed to Prove Continuous Hostile Possession for Over 12 Years Under Section 100 CPC.

The present appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arises from a suit for permanent injunction filed by the original plaintiff...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Cancelling Fair Price Shop License Without Hearing — Violation of Natural Justice Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955. License Cancellation Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Audi Alteram Partem Principle.

The petitioner, Dinesh Bansilal Agrawal, was a licensee of a fair price shop under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Minister of Food, Civil Su...