Search Results for "Confiscation proceedings"

284 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 284 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes GST Seizure Orders and Directs Release of Cash with Interest in Writ Petition. Seizure of INR 1 Crore Held Illegal as Cash Not Covered Under Section 67(2) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Due to Lack of 'Reasons to Believe' and Procedural Non-Compliance.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Petitioner, a proprietor registered under the GST Act, challenging two seizure orders dated 27th and 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment Order in PMLA Case for Lack of Scheduled Offence. Attachment of properties under Section 5(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 set aside as predicate offence was not a scheduled offence under PMLA.

The petitioners, Sunlight Housing Development Pvt. Ltd., Mukesh Doshi, Kaushal Doshi, and Mack Star Marketing Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notification Importing Customs Recovery Provisions for Excise Duty Interest. Section 12 of Central Excise Act, 1944 Validly Empowers Application of Customs Act Recovery Mechanisms for Interest on Delayed Payment of Excise Duty.

The petitioner, Krishnakant Sakharam Ghag, a partner of M/s Amit Textile Processors, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the va...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Non-Tribal Purchaser's Challenge to Land Confiscation Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Transfer of tribal land without prior sanction is void, and subsequent purchaser acquires no title, upholding forfeiture for distribution to tribals.

The petitioner, Smt. Urmila Ahuja, a non-tribal, purchased land measuring 6.90 acres in Village Khapri, Tahsil Kalmeshwar, District Nagpur, on 10.12.1...