Bombay High Court on Restrictive Covenants in Redevelopment
11 Feb 2026The Bombay High Court considered three interim applications arising from a suit between two cooperative housing societies concerni...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act"
1227 result(s) found
Found 1227 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Co-operative Sugar Factory in Suit for Enforcement of Bank Guarantee, Holding Document Executed by Bank is a Contract of Guarantee under Section 126 of Indian Contract Act, 1872. Bank's Liability was Unconditional and Payable on Demand, Irrespective of Disputes Between Principal Parties, and Suit not Bad for Non-Joinder of Principal Debtor.
2 Aug 2005The dispute arose from a turnkey contract for erection of a paper plant between Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a co-operative sugar factory, and ...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Date of Birth Dispute — Employee Failed to Prove Error in Service Record. Labour Court's Order to Correct Date of Birth Set Aside as Employee's Claim Was Unsubstantiated and Made at the Fag End of Service.
10 Mar 2017The petitioner, Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited, a cooperative sugar factory, challenged the judgments of the Labour Court and Indus...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — No Concluded Contract Found. Tender Conditions Required Execution of Formal Agreement, Which Never Occurred.
3 Sep 2014The appellant, Kalpataru Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance against respondent No.1, Majithia Nagar Co-operative Housing Soci...
- 123
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against CIDCO's Refusal to Grant NOC for Additional FSI for IT/ITES Development. Government Order dated 31st August 2009 enabling additional FSI for IT/ITES use is binding on CIDCO as a planning authority.
11 Jun 2012The petitioner, M/s. Shakti Commercial Premises Society Ltd., a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Coop. Societies Act, 1960, filed ...
- 139
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Paddy Land Reclamation Fee Dispute — Notification Exemption Applies Only to First 25 Cents, Not Entire Land. The Court held that the Government Notification dated 25th February 2021 exempting payment of reclamation fee for lands up to 25 cents under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 does not apply to lands exceeding 25 cents; the exemption is for the entire land only if it is within 25 cents.
15 Dec 2024The case involves the interpretation of a Government Notification dated 25th February 2021 issued under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetl...
- 1018
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Refusal of Ad-Interim Relief. Court holds that a developer cannot claim exclusive right to implement a slum rehabilitation scheme when there is a rival claim by another developer and the slum dwellers' association has the right to choose the developer.
7 May 2011The appellant, M/s Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed two appeals against the judgment and order dated 5th April 2011 passed by the learned S...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Agreement for Sale of Agricultural Land Not Enforceable as Plaintiff Did Not Demonstrate Financial Capacity and Conduct Showed Lack of Readiness.
30 Nov -0001The appellant, Jayantilal Devji Shah, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of agricultural land against the respondents. The...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Cross Appeals in Service Dispute Over Suspension and Terminal Benefits of Deceased Employee. The court held that salary during suspension is not payable if departmental enquiry is not completed, but provident fund and gratuity are statutory entitlements.
19 Jan 2011The case involves cross appeals arising from a judgment and decree dated 30.09.1992 in Special Civil Suit No. 102 of 1992. The plaintiffs, heirs of Di...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Dishonest Intention. Mere dishonour of cheque does not attract Section 420 IPC without proof of fraudulent or dishonest inducement at the time of borrowing.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 86/201...
- 144
