Search Results for "wilful disobedience"

222 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 222 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in Writ Petition. The court held that disobedience of a court order cannot be termed willful when the order has been complied with, under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of an order passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in Writ Petition. Allegation of Willful Disobedience Not Sustained as Order Under Contempt Was Complied With.

The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of an order passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal by State Officials, Sets Aside Harsh Observations. Mere Delay in Compliance Does Not Constitute Civil Contempt Under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The case arose from a contempt appeal filed by two state officials, Dinesh Waghmare and Bajirao Jadhav, against an order in Contempt Petition No.462 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Alleging Disobedience of Charity Commissioner's Orders Under Bombay Public Trusts Act. Court Does Not Decide Whether Orders Under Section 41A Are Subject to Contempt Jurisdiction.

The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of orders dated 28-5-2012 and 4-6-2012 passed by the Joint Charity Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Charge-sheet and Penalty Set Aside Due to Non-Supply of Documents and Disproportionate Punishment.

The petitioner, Abha Chawla Mohanty, was an employee of the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. appointed in October 1985. She was served with a charge-sheet ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Dispute — Holds That Dismissal for Disorderly Behaviour Under Model Standing Orders 22(a) and 22(l) Constitutes 'Disorderly Conduct' Under Section 4(6)(b)(i) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Disentitling Employee to Gratuity.

The petitioner, Jaya Hind Industries Ltd., employed the respondent, Vilas Vithalrao Takale, as a Clerk. Two charge sheets were issued to the responden...