Search Results for "voidable title"

187 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 187 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Alternative Decree for Damages. Plaintiff's claim for specific performance of flat agreement dismissed due to subsequent sale to bona fide purchaser; alternative decree for damages against original vendor confirmed.

The judgment arises from two appeals against a common decree dated 14.1.2010 passed by the Bombay High Court in Suit No.1642 of 1984. The original pla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Deputy Commissioner Cannot Exceed Revisional Jurisdiction Under Karnataka Municipalities Act – Karnataka High Court Quashes Building Licence and Khata Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice"

The petitioner challenged the orders dated 27.11.2013 and 02.08.2017 whereby the building licence granted in respect of the subject property was cance...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Found in Favor of Plaintiff. Agreement to Sell and Part Payment Established, Injunction to Prevent Alienation Upheld Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The present appeal arises from an order dated 12.02.2025 passed by the Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru, allowing I.A. Nos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Dispute — Sets Aside Trial Court Order for Lack of Application of Mind. Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC Injunction Granted Without Proper Consideration of Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss.

The appellant, Sri Yathievendra Naik @ Yathish, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Between Plaintiffs and Defendant Nos.8-11 in Property Suit — Consent Terms Accepted Despite Objections from Other Defendants. Partial Settlement Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Does Not Affect Rights of Non-Settling Defendants Who May Continue to Contest the Suit.

The suit was filed by 35 plaintiffs seeking a declaration that they are purchasers of certain property. The matter was listed for settlement as the pl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds award rejecting claim for specific performance of agreement to sell immovable property, finding no grounds under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rajesh V. Choudhary, filed Arbitration Petition No.734 of 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Sales by Karta Not Binding on Coparceners. Court holds that alienation of joint family property by a karta without legal necessity or benefit to estate does not bind other coparceners under Hindu law.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant No.1 against the judgment of the appellate court in a partition suit. The plaintiffs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Sales by Karta Not Binding on Coparceners. Hindu Law Requires Legal Necessity for Alienation of Joint Family Property; Burden on Alienee Not Discharged.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant no.1 against the judgment of the appellate court which held that sales effected by d...