Search Results for "trivial offences"

305 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 305 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegation of Sexual Assault Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Delay in FIR.

The appellant, Manikandan, was convicted by the Sessions (Fast Track Mahila) Judge, Namakkal, for offences under Sections 5(l) and 5(j)(ii) of the Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Procedural Defects and Insufficient Evidence - Fundamental Error in Framing Charge Under Deleted Provision and Inconsistent Testimony Fail to Sustain Conviction Under IPC

The High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by Appellant against his conviction and life imprisonment under Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Sections 307, 326, 504 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by the complainant (Ganapati Hegde and Ramachandra Hegde) under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Proce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 326 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Grievous Hurt Allegations.

The case pertains to an incident where the complainant, Ganapati Hegde, alleged that on 04.06.2008 at around 7:30 p.m., while he was returning home fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Film Promotion Case for Misuse of Police Commissioner's Name and Emblem. The court held that the advertisement was a promotional gimmick and did not constitute cheating, forgery, or any offence under the Information Technology Act.

The applicants, Sanjay Gupta (a film director and producer) and a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, were named as accused in FIR No....