Madras High Court Hears Appeal Against Partition Decree in Joint Family Property Suit. Appeal Filed Under Section 96 of CPC Seeks to Set Aside Decree Granting 1/4th Share to Plaintiff in Intestate Succession Case.
6 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "time keeper"
191 result(s) found
Found 191 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeals in Voluntary Retirement and Disciplinary Action Case. Employee's voluntary retirement deemed accepted as bank failed to refuse notice within prescribed period under Regulation 29 of UCO Bank (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995, and post-retirement disciplinary action invalid as show cause notice did not constitute institution of proceedings under Regulation 20(3)(ii) of UCO Bank (Officers') Service Regulations, 1979.
7 Apr 2026The dispute involved an employee of UCO Bank who sought voluntary retirement and subsequently faced disciplinary action. The employee was appointed in...
- 387
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Complainant in Cheque Dishonour Cases, Convicts Accused. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused who stopped payment without valid cause, and dispute with third party not a defence.
10 May 2024The case involves three parties: Hewlett Packard (HP), Kores (India) Ltd. (complainant/appellant), and M/s Ambitious Marketing (accused/respondent). K...
- 333
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Unpaid Invoices. Arbitration Clause in Purchase Orders Held Binding Despite Absence of Signed Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
14 Sep 2023The applicant, Parekh Plastichem Distributors LLP, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appoin...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Declaration Suit — Minor Defendants' Rights Not Properly Represented; Remands for Fresh Consideration. The trial court's decree for declaration and injunction was set aside due to failure to appoint guardian ad litem for minor defendants under Order 32 Rule 3 CPC.
10 Jul 2018The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment a...
- 32
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Minor Defendants in Declaration Suit — Remands for Fresh Trial Due to Inadequate Representation. The decree for declaration and permanent injunction was set aside as the minor defendants were not properly represented by their natural guardian under Order 41 Rule 1 CPC.
10 Jul 2018The Regular First Appeal No.1484/2003 was filed by the defendants (minors represented by their mother) against the judgment and decree dated 14.08.200...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Claims. Petitioners failed to appear or produce valid documents to prove their tribe claim, leading to dismissal of petitions.
27 Jun 2017The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Vasant Ramchandra Kumbhare and Dr. Subhash Pundlik Kumbhare challenging the orders of the Schedul...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Motor Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash Driving. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 Motor Vehicles Act as No Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving Was Adduced.
15 Feb 2017The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 16 April 19...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unreliable Trap Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
11 Aug 2016The appellant, Asaram Dhansing Umre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad, in Special Case No.5 of 1998 under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read w...
- 73
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Held Liable Despite Driver's Lack of License. Insurer Failed to Prove Willful Breach of Policy Conditions; Directed to Pay Compensation and Recover from Owner and Driver.
13 Aug 2015The appellant, Harish Dhirajlal Bilakhiya, filed a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for injuries sustained in a motor vehicl...
- 69
