Search Results for "tenants challenge"

710 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 710 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Sub-Tenant in Rent Control Matter. Sub-tenant with paid-up capital less than Rs 1 crore held entitled to protection under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 despite tenant's exclusion under Section 3(1)(b).

The case involves a dispute over the applicability of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 to a sub-tenant. The applicant, Frick India Ltd, claimed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project Despite Narrow Road Width, Applies Promissory Estoppel Against Municipal Corporation. MCGM Estopped from Refusing Permission After Granting Initial Approval and Petitioner Acting to His Detriment.

The petitioner, Gufran Suleman Qureshi, proprietor of M/s Sirsiwala Realty, sought redevelopment of a building in Mumbai. The Municipal Corporation of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Condition No. 5 of NOCs for Redevelopment Projects — Condition Imposing Payment of Expenditure Incurred by Board Held Unauthorized and Without Legal Basis. Court directs refund of amounts paid under protest pursuant to the impugned condition.

The Petitioner, Chandulal Jorawarmal Mehta, a sole proprietor of Mehta Developers, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Order in Land Reforms Act Case — Upholds Grant of Occupancy Rights to Tenants Based on Consistent Evidence of Cultivation.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the petitioners (Yusuff Ali Khan and others) challenging the order dated 30.11.2007 passed by the Land T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Eviction Decree in Partnership Property Dispute. Concurrent findings of fact that defendants were licensees, not tenants, upheld under Article 227.

The petitioners (original defendants) were a partnership firm occupying premises owned by the respondent (original plaintiff) partnership firm. Initia...