Search Results for "supplemental agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "supplemental agreement"

221 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 221 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order on Non-Arbitrability. Disputes Relating to Termination for Convenience and Non-Compete Obligations Held Not Arbitrable Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Capalpha Trade Private Limited, filed a commercial arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

High Court

High Court Quashes Termination of Railway Contract as Arbitrary and Violative of Natural Justice. Writ Petition Maintainable Despite Arbitration Clause Under Article 226 of Constitution of India, as Termination Notices Dated 13.11.2025 and 02.12.2025 Were Issued Without Adequate Hearing and With Sufficient Time Remaining for Completion.

27 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a registered partnership firm, Petitioner, challenging the termination of its contract with Central Railway authorities for const...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Sets Aside Dismissal for Default and Restores Suit on Condition of Costs. Advocate's Mistake in Noting Date Constitutes Sufficient Cause Under Order IX Rule 9 CPC.

4 Nov 2025

The present appeal arises from an order dated 20/12/2023 passed by the City Civil Court, Dadri, dismissing the appellants' (original plaintiffs') suit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Cancellation of Dharavi Redevelopment Tender and Upholds Fresh Tender Process. The court held that the State's decision to cancel the earlier tender and re-tender was a policy decision based on changed circumstances and not arbitrary, and that the petitioner had no vested right to the award of the contract.

20 Dec 2024

The petitioner, SecLink Technologies Corporation, a company incorporated in Seychelles and lead member of a consortium, challenged the cancellation of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CBI Appeal in Disproportionate Assets Case — Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) CrPC Permitted Despite Earlier Closure Report. The Court held that the Special Court could take cognizance on a charge sheet filed after further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC even if a closure report under Section 173(2) CrPC had been previously accepted.

28 Apr 2023

The case involves appeals by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against a High Court order quashing the prosecution of D. Dwarakanadha Reddy (A...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions on Lapse of Acquisition Under KIAD Act Due to Non-Passing of Award. Petitioners, Subsequent Purchasers, Argue Absence of Statutory Time Limit Does Not Allow Indefinite Delay, While Respondents Contend Delay Caused by Petitioners' Own Litigation and Interim Orders.

7 Mar 2019

The writ petitioners, subsequent purchasers of lands measuring 16 acres 4.25 guntas in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, challenged the acquisition proce...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings Under KIAD Act Due to Non-Passing of Award Within Reasonable Time. The Petitioners Contend that the Acquisition for BWSSB Sewerage Treatment Plant is Unenforceable as No Award was Passed Despite a Decade-Long Litigation.

7 Mar 2019

The case pertains to writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru by M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Case — Leave to Defend Application Not a First Statement on Substance of Dispute. Filing of application for leave to defend under Order 37 CPC does not constitute submission of first statement on substance of dispute, and application under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed before written statement is within time.

9 Apr 2018

The appellant, Haier Telecom (India) Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in a summary suit filed by the respondent, Drive India Enterprise Solutions Ltd., fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

29 Jul 2011

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

1 Jan 1970

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)