Search Results for "speculative transaction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "speculative transaction"

98 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over HAMON Mark. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'HAMON' found to be infringed by Defendant's use of 'HAMON COOLING' and 'HCS HAMON COOLING' in trade and corporate name.

6 Jul 2026

The Plaintiff, John Cockerill Hamon SA, filed a Commercial IP Suit alleging infringement and passing off of its registered trademark 'HAMON' by the De...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Injunction in Property Partition Suit — No Prima Facie Case or Irreparable Loss Established. Court upholds Single Judge's finding that appellant failed to demonstrate exclusive ownership or possession of suit property, and balance of convenience did not favor grant of injunction.

1 Apr 2022

The appeal arose from an order dated 25th October 2021 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the Appellant's Interim Ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Independent Application of Mind — Reopening Based on Borrowed Satisfaction from Investigation Wing Held Invalid

8 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Chhagan Chandrakant Bhujbal, challenged a notice dated 31 March 2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the ass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Mar 2021

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Winding Up Petition Against Airline Company for Inability to Pay Debts. Creditor's Statutory Demand for USD 3 Million Remained Unpaid, Leading to Order for Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

18 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) r...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assessment Order in Income Tax Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Provide Opportunity of Being Heard Before Dispute Resolution Panel. The court held that the Dispute Resolution Panel's failure to grant a hearing under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, vitiated the assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Act.

24 Apr 2015

The petitioner, M/S Tejas Networks Limited, a company engaged in software development, manufacturing, and trading of networking equipment, filed its r...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Defendant's Petition and Dismisses Plaintiff's Revision in Summary Suit — Conditional Leave to Defend Upheld but Deposit Reduced. Court held that while the trial court had discretion to impose conditions under Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC, the condition of depositing 50% of the suit claim was disproportionate and reduced it to 25%.

10 Oct 2014

The case involves two petitions arising from an order dated 30.03.2013 passed by the XXVII Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, in O.S.No.8306/2012...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit Under Order 37 CPC — Deposit of 50% of Suit Claim with Interest Upheld as Reasonable Condition. Court holds that while granting leave to defend, the trial court must balance the interests of both parties and can impose conditions to secure the plaintiff's claim, but such conditions must not be arbitrary or excessive.

10 Oct 2014

The case involves two petitions arising from an order dated 30.03.2013 passed by the XXVII Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, in O.S.No.8306/2012...

8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)