Search Results for "soil investigation notice"

108 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 108 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC & ST Act Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Was Inconsistent and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Rape.

The case involves four appeals filed by Dastgir Gafur Shaha, Bhausaheb Madhukar Gore, Javed Gafur Shaha, and Arbaj @ Mosin Kadir Shaikh against their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape and Criminal Intimidation of Minor Daughter. Sentence of 5 Years RI Held Adequate; State's Appeal for Enhancement Dismissed.

The judgment arises from three connected proceedings: Criminal Appeal No. 218 of 2013 filed by the accused Madhukar Makaji Mudgul against his convicti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Two Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix. Conviction under Section 376(2) IPC set aside as evidence of prosecutrix was found to be untrustworthy and contradictory.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by original accused persons, Ali Mohd. Subrati Khan (Accused No.2) and Mobin Sherali Khan (Accused No.1),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Circumstantial Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove common intention and the chain of circumstances was incomplete.

The appellants, Deepak Annaraya Metakari (original accused No.1), Ramchandra Mhalappa Petaragi (original accused No.3), and Kamalabai Siddhappa Kothe ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Lack of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction Based on Suspicion and Moral Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Under Sections 302, 498-A, 323, 506 IPC.

The appellants, Yankappa and Hanmant, were convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Bijapur in S.C.No.191/2013 for offences under Sections 323, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in NDPS Case — Failure to Prove Cultivation of Opium Poppy Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Prosecution failed to establish that the plants seized were opium poppy due to lack of chemical analysis and independent panch witness testimony.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 9th May 2000 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Claim for Damages in Wild Life Sanctuary Case — No Right to Compensation Without Acquisition. Notification Under Section 18 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Right to Damages for Loss of Use.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Natesan Agencies (Plantations), a partnership firm, against the judgment of the Madras High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Prosecution's case based on motive and last seen evidence held insufficient to convict accused under Sections 302, 379, 201 read with 34 IPC.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the judgment of acquittal passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Chikmagalur in S.C.No.59/2011, acquitting th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Accused in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Medical Evidence and Non-Examination of Material Witness. Conviction under Sections 363, 377 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove penetrative sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dilip Jaglal Warkhede, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act) and Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal Case No...