Search Results for "reopening accounts"

176 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 176 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in Income Tax Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Independent Satisfaction. Notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 held invalid as Assessing Officer failed to form independent belief based on tangible material.

The petitioner, Devkant Synthetics India Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in trading of shares and securities, filed its return of income for assessment y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment After Four Years Invalid as Assessee Had Made Full Disclosure During Original Assessment Under Section 143(3).

The petitioner, Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd., challenged a notice dated 28 March 2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasonable Belief. Reassessment Based on Borrowed Satisfaction from Investigation Wing Without Independent Application of Mind by Assessing Officer is Invalid.

The Petitioner, Nirmal Bang Securities Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice dated 30th March 2007 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reassessment Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Reassessment Notice Based on Alleged Discrepancy in Accounts Found During Search Was Not Justified as Accounts Were Already Subject to Scrutiny Under Section 143(3).

The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 4.7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Hotel Sale Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.1.88 crore with interest for breach of contract, rejecting grounds under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Sahara Hospitality Limited (formerly Batra Hospitality Private Limited), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Full and True Disclosure. Assessee's Claim for Deduction Under Section 80-IA Was Considered During Original Assessment, Hence No Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Titanor Components Limited, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenged a notice issued under Section 147 of the Act for re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reopening Case. ITAT's Decision Invalidating Reopening Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Upheld Due to Lack of Reasonable Belief.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that the reopeni...