Search Results for "rehabilitation act"

Trending :

Search Results for "rehabilitation act"

1458 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1458 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Notice Under Section 16(2)(a) of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Court directs respondents to issue notice to project affected persons before denying rehabilitation benefits.

7 Apr 2026

The petitioners, legal heirs of a deceased project affected person, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the respondents to issue a notice unde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish complete chain of circumstances and motive, with key witnesses turning hostile and burden under Section 106 Evidence Act not triggered.

2 Jan 2023

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his two young sons. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Alternate Land for Project Affected Persons Under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Court Directs State to Issue Notice Under Section 16(2)(a) and Consider Claim for Alternate Land for Lands Submerged Under Mahind Pond Project.

8 Dec 2022

The petitioners, legal heirs of Maruti Ganu Supnekar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cour...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Landowners' Appeals in Land Acquisition for Upper Krishna Project Rehabilitation Township. Acquisition of 1275 Acres for Rehabilitation of Displaced Persons Upheld as Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Judicial Review Under Article 226 Limited to Arbitrariness or Violation of Statute.

20 Jul 2022

The writ appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the common judgment and order dated 10.12.2021 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Lapsed as Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Despite Award Made in 2008.

2 May 2019

The petitioners, Reliance Natural Resources Limited and its director Murli Manohar Purohit, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

27 Apr 2018

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration That Diploma in Special Education Is Equivalent to D.Ed. General for Primary Teachers. Court Holds That State Regulations Prescribing D.Ed. General as Essential Qualification Override Central Equivalence Claims.

28 Jul 2017

The dispute arose from the State of Maharashtra's decision to absorb special teachers, previously employed under the Integrated Education Scheme for p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and challenge after award is barred by delay and laches.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Bhawarlal Shankarlal Sarda and Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda, filed two writ petitions challenging the land acquisition proceedings init...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)