Search Results for "railway administration"

847 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 847 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railway Claims Tribunal Rejection of Compensation for Untoward Incident. Held that strict proof of boarding train is not required under Section 124-A of Railways Act, 1989 and the claimant's version must be accepted unless rebutted by strong evidence.

The appellant, Nitin Navindas Hundiwala, a 75-year-old consultant, filed a claim for compensation under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deemed Death as Untoward Incident Despite Crossing Tracks. Held that a bonafide passenger who falls from a train and dies on tracks is covered under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, even if later found on tracks.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal dismissing a claim for compensation under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Deemed Passenger Rule Applied. Death of a person found on railway premises with a valid ticket is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the burden to prove negligence is not on the claimant.

The appellants, being the wife, minor son, and parents of the deceased Lahu Kotlapure, filed a claim application under Section 124 of the Railways Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Dependents in Railway Accident Case — Deemed Untoward Incident Under Section 124-A of Railways Act, 1989. Deceased's attempt to board a moving train held to be an untoward incident, not self-inflicted injury, entitling dependents to compensation.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, dismissing the claim of the dependents of Deepak Nattuji Thakre, who died af...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Railway Employee Challenging CAT Order Dismissing Pension Claim on Limitation Grounds. Delay Caused by Respondent's Negligence Cannot Bar Substantive Claim for Pensionary Benefits.

The petitioner, Shri Raghunath Nathoo Bari, a retired Junior Clerk of the Chief Security Commissioner's Office, Central Railway, Mumbai, filed a writ ...