Search Results for "property identification number"

545 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 545 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case. Accused Convicted Under Sections 364-A, 363, 384, 120-B IPC for Abducting a Minor Boy and Demanding Rs. 15 Lakhs Ransom.

The case involves the abduction of a five-and-a-half-year-old boy, Atharva, from Raja Shivaji Nagar, Chinchwad, on 09/04/2010. The accused Nos. 1 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Murder, Abduction, and Robbery Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Establish Conspiracy Under Section 120-B IPC Despite Lack of Direct Link Between Co-Accused.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Cyrone Rodrigues and Chandrakant Talwar & Pappu @ Appu against their conviction and sentencing by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Triple Murder and Robbery Case — Circumstantial Evidence Found Insufficient to Sustain Conviction. Last Seen Circumstance and Recovery of Stolen Articles Fail to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of three persons, Premchand Jain, his wife Anandi Devi, and their unmarried daughter Preeti, and the robbery of cash a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement and Passing Off in 'MARINE' Mark Dispute. Plaintiff's registered trademarks for adhesives and sealants protected against defendant's use of identical mark for similar goods.

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, filed a suit against Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Limited alleging infringement of its registered tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Railway Property Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge. Possession of railway property without proof of knowledge or reason to believe it is railway property does not attract Section 3(a) of Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Bhagwat Rajaram Patil, was the owner of a rolling mill at Manyarkheda, Jalgaon. On 18 July 1999, the Railway Protection Force (RPF) co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute — Widow's Absolute Ownership Under Section 14(1) Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Upheld. Property Received in Lieu of Maintenance Confers Full Estate, Not Limited Interest.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a suit filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents) against the original defendants (appellants) c...