Search Results for "prohibition officer"

2281 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2281 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Due to Inordinate Delay and Non-Application of Mind — Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, Section 56. Externment order set aside as stale offences, acquittals ignored, and stereotype witness statements violated principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Kishor Rambhaoji Narad, challenged an externment order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Warora, under Section 56 of the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Discharges Accused in Land Grabbing Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Court holds that mere revenue inspector report without verification of title deeds cannot sustain charges under Section 420 IPC and Section 192-A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act.

The petitioner, Sri Chennakeshava, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blanket Prohibitory Order Under Section 144 CrPC in Bengaluru, Holds It Violative of Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b); Order Cancelling Protest Permissions Against CAA Struck Down as District Magistrate Failed to Apply Mind and Provide Material Facts.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions challenging an order dated 18 December 2019 issued by the District Magistrate-cum-Commissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Commission Order in Manual Scavenging Case — Complaint Lacks Material Particulars. Petitioner Not an 'Occupier' Under Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 as Housekeeping Done by Contractor's Workers.

The petitioner, National Institute of Rock Mechanics, a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, and an autonomous ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cardiologist to Move 2D Echo Machine to Other Hospitals for Treating Critical Heart Patients Under PCPNDT Act. Machine Used Exclusively for Cardiology, Not for Prenatal Diagnosis, Hence Movement Not Prohibited Under Section 3 of PCPNDT Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Dr. Deepak Sane, a cardiologist in Nagpur, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15.01.2015 passed by the Nodal Officer (R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in SEBI PFUTP Regulations Case Due to Non-Disclosure of Investigation Report. The Court Held That the Investigation Report Under Regulation 9 Must Be Disclosed to Ensure a Fair Hearing Under Principles of Natural Justice, as It Forms the Basis for the Show Cause Notice.

The dispute arose from a show cause notice issued by SEBI to the appellant, alleging violations of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trad...