Search Results for "prejudicial activity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "prejudicial activity"

234 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 234 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Railway Shoe-Shine Policy and Upholds Tender Process for Cooperative Societies. Policy aimed at generating employment for lower strata through cooperative societies was held not arbitrary, and petitioner's claim for exclusive contract was rejected as right to livelihood does not confer monopoly under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

18 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Petitioners, a society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, against the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Preventive Detention Under PITNDPS Act for Lack of Application of Mind to Custody and Bail Likelihood. Detention Orders Quashed as Detaining Authority Failed to Record Satisfaction That Detenus in Judicial Custody Were Likely to Be Released on Bail and Would Indulge in Prejudicial Activity.

20 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the dismissal of writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders under the Prevention of Illicit T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Orders for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Compliance with Maharashtra Police Act. Externment Orders Under Section 56 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Set Aside as Show Cause Notices Were Vague and Authority Failed to Record Satisfaction Regarding Witnesses' Unwillingness.

22 Nov 2019

The petitioners, Limbaji @ Vijay s/o Govind Ghobale and Hari @ Haridas (Haribhau) s/o Limbaji @ Ghobale, filed separate criminal writ petitions challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution. The Court Held That a 19-Day Gap Between Passing and Service of Detention Order Without Explanation Violates the Detenu's Right to Make a Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

18 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Vishnu @ Bablu Vasant Gawali, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Failure to Consider Retraction of Statement and Delay of Over 11 Months in Passing Order Vitiate Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 3(1)(i) of COFEPOSA Act, 1976.

5 May 2017

The petitioner, Gaurav Kanak Jain, challenged a detention order dated 21st November 2016 passed under Section 3(1)(i) of the Conservation of Foreign E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail Application and Acquittal in Main Case Not Considered. Failure to Consider Pending Bail Application and Subsequent Acquittal in Substantive Offence Vitiated Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act.

18 Nov 2016

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Sanaullah Abdul Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 23.12.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Pol...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Orders.

8 May 2015

The petitioner, Shailesh Dnyaneshwar Kedar, challenged a detention order dated 23 November 2014 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application. Failure to Disclose Compelling Reasons for Detention Despite Awareness of Custody Renders Order Invalid Under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

27 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Pravin @ Purshottam Shrinivas Mahajan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 29 April 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application — Detaining Authority Failed to Disclose Compelling Reasons for Detention.

27 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Pravin @ Purshottam Shrinivas Mahajan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 29 April 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Relocation of BARC Nuclear Reactor Due to Tsunami and Fault Line Concerns. Court Holds No Credible Scientific Evidence of Imminent Danger to Nuclear Installation from Geological Fault Line or Tsunami.

28 Apr 2005

The Bombay High Court dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Citizens For A Just Society, a social organization founded by Dr. Usha Meh...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)