Search Results for "precedent overlooked"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "precedent overlooked"

300 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 300 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Transaction Dispute — No Perversity or Wednesbury Unreasonableness Found. The Court held that a new argument not raised before the arbitrator or in Section 34 proceedings cannot be raised for the first time in a Section 37 appeal.

15 Apr 2024

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by SATCO Capital Markets Ltd. against Rahul H Bajaj....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Caste Certificate — Child of Inter-Caste Marriage Entitled to Mother's Scheduled Caste Certificate When Brought Up in That Community. The court held that the Designated Authority must consider the child's social upbringing and community acceptance, not merely the father's caste, in determining caste entitlement.

20 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Nikhil Meena Patel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 26 February 2021 p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Clause Validity Dispute Under Lease Agreement. The arbitration clause designating the lessee's Managing Director as sole arbitrator is upheld as valid under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, absent contravention of public policy.

1 Feb 2022

The Supreme Court heard appeals by Indian Oil Corporation Limited against a judgment of the Bombay High Court. The dispute arose from a lease agreemen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Bail for Most Accused in NDPS Cases but Cancels Bail for One Due to Recovery of Commercial Quantities. The Court held that confessional statements under Section 67 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 are inadmissible and cannot form the basis for bail denial, except where commercial quantities are recovered from the accused's possession.

10 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court dealt with multiple special leave petitions filed by the Narcotic Control Bureau (NCB) challenging bail orders granted by the High C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Anticipatory Bail in Murder Case Due to Erroneous High Court Order. High Court's Reliance on Incomplete Investigation Report Under Section 173 CrPC at Anticipatory Bail Stage Was Impermissible, and Anticipatory Bail Should Not Be Granted in Serious Offences Like Murder Under Section 302 IPC Without Cogent Reasons.

8 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions challenging judgments of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, whic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by State Employer Challenging Industrial Court's Order in Unfair Labour Practice Cases. Daily Wage Workers' Regularisation Upheld Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

20 Jun 2012

The petitioners, the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Pune, and the State of Maharashtra, challenged a common order dated 18 January 1999 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Dispute — Upholds Majority Award on Misrepresentation of Receivables. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's findings on misrepresentation and damages were not perverse and did not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Mar 2012

The petitioner, GWL Properties Ltd. (formerly Gordon Woodroffe Ltd.), challenged a majority arbitral award dated 31 August 2009 under Section 34 of th...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Broker's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Client Dispute Over Delay Paying Charges. Unilateral Charging of 2% Daily Interest Without Specific Agreement or Proof of Loss Held Unconscionable and Not Enforceable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

7 Mar 2012

The case involves a dispute between Sharekhan Limited, a trading member/broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), and Nita Thakkar, a client. The bro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Group Adjustment Letter Authorized Set-off of Losses Across Family Accounts. The court upheld the arbitral award rejecting the client's claim for unauthorized trades and wrongful disposal of shares, holding that the group adjustment letter was binding and the client failed to prove unauthorized trades.

27 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Manjula Arvind Thakkar, challenged an arbitral award dated 10 February 2010 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted under the Byel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Procedural Order in Arbitration Proceeding. Section 9 or Section 19 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Cannot Be Invoked to Challenge Arbitrator's Communication Regarding Procedure.

28 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Sahyadri Earthmovers, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 read with Section 19 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

8 9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)